Sources indicated on 16 October 2026 that the Ningbo Maritime Safety Administration said three different marine fuels were supplied on the same day to separate vessels berthed at Ningbo‑Zhoushan in China. The administration described the event as the first recorded instance in which liquefied natural gas, methanol and a B24 biodiesel blend were bunkered at the same port on the same day.
The report identifies the LNG bunker vessel Haiyang Shiyou 302 as having delivered about 7,400 cubic metres, roughly 3,300 tonnes, of LNG at the Chuanshan port area. Details in the supplied notes do not set out the timings of the delivery or the names and cargoes of the other vessels involved.
Sources published the account on 16 October 2026, attributing the operational details to the Ningbo Maritime Safety Administration. The source material supplied for this item is limited to the administration's statement and the single LNG volume figure recorded for the Haiyang Shiyou 302.
Three fuels in a single day
According to the Ningbo MSA cited in the report, the simultaneous availability and supply of LNG, methanol and B24 to different berthed ships represents a first for the port complex. The statement framed the occurrence as notable within the context of bunkering practice, without providing volumetric data for methanol or B24 in the supplied notes.
The account therefore confirms only that three fuel types were supplied on one calendar day and that the LNG transfer involved the Haiyang Shiyou 302 and the Chuanshan port area. No further operational particulars, supplier names, storage arrangements or berthing sequences were included in the verified notes.
Implications for bunkering operations
The Ningbo MSA's report, as summarised by reports, highlights an intersection of fuel choices at a single port facility. The supplied facts point to a moment when multiple fuel streams were handled contemporaneously, an outcome that will attract attention from ship operators, bunker suppliers and regulators seeking to track how ports manage a broader range of marine fuels.
The verified material does not specify the operational controls applied or the safety procedures used during the transfers. The absence of such detail in the supplied notes limits what can be reported about how segregation of fuels, contamination prevention or shore‑side storage were managed during the day in question.
The Ningbo‑Zhoushan complex is identified in the report as the location for the three bunkering operations and the Chuanshan port area is named for the LNG delivery. Beyond those place names the supplied facts do not provide further geographic, commercial or administrative detail about the individual berths or terminals involved.
The reports item cited the Ningbo Maritime Safety Administration as its source for the sequence of events. The verified notes record the LNG quantity for the Haiyang Shiyou 302 and the administration's characterisation of the day as a first for the port, but they do not supply additional measurements, vessel identities for the methanol and B24 recipients, or accompanying regulatory commentary.
In the absence of further published figures or procedural descriptions within the supplied notes, readers are left with a clear, if narrowly framed, account: a single day in which LNG, methanol and a B24 blend were each bunkered to berthed ships at the Ningbo‑Zhoushan complex, and the LNG transfer involved about 7,400 cubic metres delivered by the Haiyang Shiyou 302 at Chuanshan. The original report is dated 16 October 2026 and cites the Ningbo Maritime Safety Administration for the information it presents.
Editor profile